911 The Unhappy Anniversary
September 11th 2009 09:08
Here we are again, another year has passed, and we are no where nearer finding out the truth of what actually took place on that fateful day, in New York and at the Pentagon.
However, let us first remember the poor innocents who were killed that day, all those in the buildings that is, for there is no proof anyone was killed in the planes, we were just told they died, and most likely the passengers did die that day, but where, and how?
The planes that hit the World Trade Centre buildings, according to eye witnesses, including American reporters on live broadcast, stated the planes were cargo planes, no windows along the side of the fuselage, no airline insignia on the tail and the documentary "911: In Plane Site" shows the CBS footage of the day, and that clearly shows no tail ensignia, and a large tube shape running down the left side of the second plane's belly.
The Pentagon's roof remained intact for forty odd minutes after the hit, yet the plane alleged to have hit it, would have smashed its tail into that roof line.
Then there is the lack of debris; there were two pieces actually, one a small piece of fuselage lying way out front on a pristine piece of lawn, and a small engine rotor, that only comes up to the fireman's knee, who was standing next to it. A heavy jet's rotors are eleven feet in diameter.
And where did the wings and engines go before impact? They certainly did not strike the face of the building. The official explanation; the entire plane folded up into a spear....sounds like a convenient story but not one that fits the physics of the situation.
No bodies, no chairs, no wheel assemblies, nothing was left, this had never happened in aviation history before. Why? Because of the laws of science. The fire did not burn long enough, nor hot enough, to have completely disintegrated all that mass of plane and people.
But, don't take my layman's interpretation of the events, read what this man has to say, then look at what his expertise is in;
Video 7/11/06:
"One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?"
Major General Albert Stubblebine;
Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame. U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.
Even if it did, where were the skeletons? Even in a funeral parlour furnace the skeleton largely remains intact, and that then is pulverised into granules for placement in an urn.
Yet, the official government report stated that all was destroyed in the fire after the crash...
Where were all the black boxes? None were retrieved at the Trade Centre, nothing has been released about them at all.
Ask your self this; how could a heavy passenger jet full of people completely disappear, leaving only a 16 foot wide hole inside the impact resistant walled Pentagon? How could an aluminium jet punch through three heavily fortified walls leaving a 16 foot wide hole?
Eye witnesses decribed the 'plane' that they saw hit the Pentagon, "a small light aircraft", another said, "it looked like a cruise missile."
"In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. AIR FORCE (ret)
Essay Extract:
"The debris found outside the Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a Boeing 757 or any aircraft of comparable dimensions. In particular, in the absence of some agency (possibly unknown to physical science) that removed the wings, there is no way to avoid the conclusion that the wings (and therefore the aircraft) were never present in the first place. In this case, no Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001."
Professor A. K. Dewdney
LINK: physics 911
For more detailed analysis by experts of the 911 events, see following link;
[/COLOR] LINK: physics 911
Lastly, just what benefit does Australia's press get from not challenging the blatant coverup and lies perpetrated by the previous President's administration and its appointed investigators? That part I cannot fathom.
However, let us first remember the poor innocents who were killed that day, all those in the buildings that is, for there is no proof anyone was killed in the planes, we were just told they died, and most likely the passengers did die that day, but where, and how?
The planes that hit the World Trade Centre buildings, according to eye witnesses, including American reporters on live broadcast, stated the planes were cargo planes, no windows along the side of the fuselage, no airline insignia on the tail and the documentary "911: In Plane Site" shows the CBS footage of the day, and that clearly shows no tail ensignia, and a large tube shape running down the left side of the second plane's belly.
The Pentagon's roof remained intact for forty odd minutes after the hit, yet the plane alleged to have hit it, would have smashed its tail into that roof line.
Roof line still intact...how?
Then there is the lack of debris; there were two pieces actually, one a small piece of fuselage lying way out front on a pristine piece of lawn, and a small engine rotor, that only comes up to the fireman's knee, who was standing next to it. A heavy jet's rotors are eleven feet in diameter.
And where did the wings and engines go before impact? They certainly did not strike the face of the building. The official explanation; the entire plane folded up into a spear....sounds like a convenient story but not one that fits the physics of the situation.
All that plane making a 16 foot hole and becoming a spear...really?
Fuselage placement.... note the grass is untouched.
No bodies, no chairs, no wheel assemblies, nothing was left, this had never happened in aviation history before. Why? Because of the laws of science. The fire did not burn long enough, nor hot enough, to have completely disintegrated all that mass of plane and people.
But, don't take my layman's interpretation of the events, read what this man has to say, then look at what his expertise is in;
Major General Albert Stubblebine
Video 7/11/06:
"One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?"
Major General Albert Stubblebine;
Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame. U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.
Even if it did, where were the skeletons? Even in a funeral parlour furnace the skeleton largely remains intact, and that then is pulverised into granules for placement in an urn.
Yet, the official government report stated that all was destroyed in the fire after the crash...
Where were all the black boxes? None were retrieved at the Trade Centre, nothing has been released about them at all.
Ask your self this; how could a heavy passenger jet full of people completely disappear, leaving only a 16 foot wide hole inside the impact resistant walled Pentagon? How could an aluminium jet punch through three heavily fortified walls leaving a 16 foot wide hole?
Plane defies physics and logic...
Inside Pentagon: hole allegedly left by passenger jet.
Eye witnesses decribed the 'plane' that they saw hit the Pentagon, "a small light aircraft", another said, "it looked like a cruise missile."
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. AIR FORCE (ret)
"In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. AIR FORCE (ret)
Professor A. K. Dewdney
Essay Extract:
"The debris found outside the Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a Boeing 757 or any aircraft of comparable dimensions. In particular, in the absence of some agency (possibly unknown to physical science) that removed the wings, there is no way to avoid the conclusion that the wings (and therefore the aircraft) were never present in the first place. In this case, no Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001."
Professor A. K. Dewdney
LINK: physics 911
For more detailed analysis by experts of the 911 events, see following link;
[/COLOR] LINK: physics 911
Lastly, just what benefit does Australia's press get from not challenging the blatant coverup and lies perpetrated by the previous President's administration and its appointed investigators? That part I cannot fathom.
| 51 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
subscribe to this blog
Comment by Janet Collins
Acceptable Etiquette
The Social Critic
Janet Collins Blog
There are a lot of unexplained details in this whole debacle. To me, it was all about giving the government the right to control the population through the terrorism laws that came after and many could not publicly object.
Don't forget the following bombings in Bali gave the Australian government the same right so to speak.
We will never know.
Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
Screen Trek
QUOTE ME NO QUOTES!
thanks for commenting, and yes you may be right, but I am hoping enough people keep on the case to force the liars out into the open.
However, my hopes in Obama being that man of conscience is quickly fading, he is letting it all slide, probably because he doesn't want to end up in an open cavalcade through Dallas.....
But what does this really say about our collective society, the West?
We claim to stand upon the higher moral ground, yet many people in the press and governments around the Western world are keeping their mouths shut, letting the real "evil doers" get away with the most despicable atrocity committed in USA history.
And you are right about Bali, and even the London bombings look suspect after the 911 conspiracy.
cheers and lets hope somehow someone grows a conscience....I won't hold my breath..
fog
Comment by sumaya rahman
Paradigm of Melange
I read somewhere that these attacks were meant to draw more and more people into the folds of the New World Order. Plus, apparently, everything connected to the New World Order is a game of numbers, you just have to know the numbers to be able to attribute a deed to the Order.
The Order has succeeded largely because more than three-fourths of the people believe what the media said and still maintains about 9/11.
Nice post.
Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
Screen Trek
QUOTE ME NO QUOTES!
thanks for commenting, and the compliment!
As for the NWO, maybe there is such a cabal, but, what is more important is breaking down the wall of denial the general populace in the West suffers from, regarding the 911 conspiracy.
I have posted numerous times on this issue, with important quotes from people who are ex-military, investigators, pilots etc.
Here are a couple more posts I did on this matter
LINK 1
LINK2
cheers
fog